Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1995-05-04 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1995-05-04 House Journal Page 1866 HB 286 Representative Porter gave notice of reconsideration of his vote on CSHB 286(FIN) am. Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that the reconsideration of CSHB 286(FIN) am be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The following was again before the House: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 286(FIN) am "An Act providing an exemption from gambling and certain alcoholic beverage laws for gambling conducted by cruise ships for their ticketed passengers in the offshore water of the state; relating to promotions on board cruise ships; defining 'cruise ship'; providing for exemption procedures for certain cruise ships before they can conduct gambling in the offshore water of the 1995-05-04 House Journal Page 1867 HB 286 state; providing an exemption from the coin-operated device tax for cruise ships exempted from the gambling laws; and providing for an effective date." Representative Martin moved and asked unanimous consent that the reconsideration of CSHB 286(FIN) am be held to the May 5, 1995, calendar. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall the reconsideration of CSHB 286(FIN) am be held to the May 5, 1995, calendar?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 286(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Hold reconsideration to 5/5 calendar YEAS: 10 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Austerman, Brown, B.Davis, Green, Grussendorf, Kelly, Kohring, Martin, Ogan, Parnell Nays: Brice, Bunde, Davies, G.Davis, Elton, Foster, Ivan, Kott, Kubina, Mackie, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Absent: Barnes, Finkelstein, Hanley, James, MacLean And so, the motion failed. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CSHB 286(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 286(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 26 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 5 1995-05-04 House Journal Page 1868 HB 286 Yeas: Austerman, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Foster, Grussendorf, Ivan, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Nays: Green, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Ogan, Parnell, Therriault Absent: Barnes, Finkelstein, Hanley, James, Moses Kott changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Kelly changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, CSHB 286(FIN) am passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Vezey moved the effective date clause. Representative MacLean placed a call of the House. The call was satisfied. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 286(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 34 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Nays: Barnes, Hanley, Martin, Masek, Ogan, Parnell And so, the effective date clause was adopted. CSHB 286(FIN) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.